Welcome Guest to Coatings World    Login || Register
Last Updated Tuesday, July 22 2014
Print RSS Feed

COATINGS INDUSTRY REACTS



Published August 9, 2005
 The International Maritime Organization (IMO), the United Nations Specialized Agency with responsibility
for the safety of shipping and the prevention of marine pollution by ships, signed an agreement
at a meeting in London, England on October 5, 2001, calling for the prohibition of harmful organotins
in antifouling paints used on ships and the establishment of a mechanism to prevent the potential
future use of other harmful substances in antifouling systems. Under the terms of the convention,
member countries of the IMO are required “to prohibit and/or restrict the use of harmful
antifouling systems on ships flying their flag, as well as ships not entitled to fly their flag but which
operate under their jurisdiction, and all ships that enter a port, shipyard or offshore terminal of a
member nation.” Member nations are required to ban the continued use of organotin-containing
antifouling paints by Jan. 1, 2003, and to fully eliminate these paints from all ships by Jan. 1, 2008.
A provision is included in the agreement allowing ships to place a coating over non-compliant materials
that forms a barrier and prevents them from leaching into the water.
Response throughout the coatings industry has been positive and supportive. The European
Council of Paint Manufacturers (CEPE) released a statement that its members “are committed
to comply with this resolution.”
Arch Chemicals, a specialty chemicals company, also released a statement praising the agreement.
“We welcome the IMO accord,” said Robert J. Martin, Arch’s global manager of marine paints. Arch has
already developed alternative biocides for use in antifouling paints. “We are confident that we can fill
a significant portion of the void left by the removal of the presence of banned marine paints from the
market,” Mr. Martin said.
Carol Rosler of marine paint manufacturer Jotun sees the decision as an opportunity. “We support
the resolution and look upon it as a unique opportunity to work with our customers to meet not only
IMO demands, but their own demands as well,” she said. “Our goal is to partner with our customers to
help educate them regarding the IMO’s


blog comments powered by Disqus
Receive free Coatings World emails
Sign up now to receive the weekly newsletter, and more!

Enter your email address:
Company Spotlight
Buhler Group (Nanotechnology)
13105 12th Ave. North
Plymouth, MN, 55441-4509

View Profile
AZ Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.
No. 458-6, Sinsing Road Hu Kou Township Hsinchu Country 303, Taiwan
Hsinchu Country, Taiwan, 303
Taiwan
View Profile
BASF Corporation
100 Campus Drive
Florham Park, NJ, 07932
US
View Profile
Houchi Chemical Co., Ltd
No.56, Fu Chow Street
Taipei, Taipei, 100
Taiwan
View Profile
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc.
9911 Brecksville Road
Cleveland, OH, 44141
US
View Profile
Sunin Machine Co., Ltd.
No.96, Chiao Ho Rd ,Chungho Dist
New Taipei City, Taiwan , 235
Taiwan Roc
View Profile
Keeneyes
18F, No.85, Sec. 1, Chung-Shiao E. Rd.
Taipei, Taiwan, 100
R.O.C.
View Profile
Micro Powders, Inc.
580 White Plains Rd.
Tarrytown, NY, 10591
US
View Profile
Sun Chemical Corporation Performance Pigments
5020 Spring Grove Avenue
Cincinnati, OH, 45232
USA
View Profile
Shamrock Technologies, Inc.
Foot of Pacific Street
Newark, NJ, 07114
USA
View Profile
Follow Coatings World On