Welcome Guest to Coatings World    Login || Register
Last Updated Tuesday, July 29 2014
Print

Judge Denies NPCA’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction in California Emissions Fee Case



Published August 16, 2005
Related Searches: Architectural Coatings
Judge Denies NPCA’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction in California Emissions Fee Case
At a April 22 hearing in a California Superior Court in Sacramento, Judge Raymond M. Cadei denied NPCA’s motion for a preliminary injunction in NPCA v. CARB, thereby permitting the Air Resources Board to collect VOC emissions fees from NPCA members under the state’s AB10X Emissions Fee Program.
The fees—which range from $14,000 to $750,000—are assessed against manufacturers of architectural coatings and consumer products whose emissions are 250 tons or more per year and are assessed on an annual basis. Until the hearing—and at NPCA’s urging—CARB had voluntarily agreed not to collect these fees from NPCA members.
Procedurally, this is a ruling on the motion for a preliminary injunction and it is not the final decision on the merits of the case, according to NPCA. Although this is an “appealable” decision, NPCA contends that an appeal at this juncture would be futile because the standards the appellate court applies to a ruling on a motion for preliminary injunction are very deferential to the trial court, as opposed to the standard that will apply on appeal from a final judgment. Accordingly, NPCA plans to expedite the final adjudication of the case at the trial court level, working diligently to bring this case to a favorable resolution.
As a result of the ruling, NPCA members’ obligation to pay these fees is no longer suspended and member companies who have not paid the 2004–2005 fee must submit payment. In preliminary discussions with CARB, the agency indicated that these payments should be made in three to four weeks from the hearing date.
At the trial level, NPCA will remain steadfast in its argument that the VOC emissions “fee” is really a masked tax. Certain criteria must be met in order for the state to levy regulatory fees, and NPCA maintains that these “fees” eschew these criteria by a wide margin. NPCA is also arguing that even if


blog comments powered by Disqus
Receive free Coatings World emails
Sign up now to receive the weekly newsletter, and more!

Enter your email address:
Company Spotlight
Buhler Group (Nanotechnology)
13105 12th Ave. North
Plymouth, MN, 55441-4509

View Profile
AZ Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.
No. 458-6, Sinsing Road Hu Kou Township Hsinchu Country 303, Taiwan
Hsinchu Country, Taiwan, 303
Taiwan
View Profile
Sunin Machine Co., Ltd.
No.96, Chiao Ho Rd ,Chungho Dist
New Taipei City, Taiwan , 235
Taiwan Roc
View Profile
BASF Corporation
100 Campus Drive
Florham Park, NJ, 07932
US
View Profile
Micro Powders, Inc.
580 White Plains Rd.
Tarrytown, NY, 10591
US
View Profile
Sun Chemical Corporation Performance Pigments
5020 Spring Grove Avenue
Cincinnati, OH, 45232
USA
View Profile
Shamrock Technologies, Inc.
Foot of Pacific Street
Newark, NJ, 07114
USA
View Profile
Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc.
9911 Brecksville Road
Cleveland, OH, 44141
US
View Profile
Houchi Chemical Co., Ltd
No.56, Fu Chow Street
Taipei, Taipei, 100
Taiwan
View Profile
Keeneyes
18F, No.85, Sec. 1, Chung-Shiao E. Rd.
Taipei, Taiwan, 100
R.O.C.
View Profile
Follow Coatings World On