Welcome Guest to Coatings World    Login || Register
Last Updated Saturday, October 10 2015

CEPE Comments on

Published August 9, 2005
Calling it a “key issue for our industry this year and probably for many years to come,” Klaus Matthias, chairman of the safety, health and environment operating group of CEPE commented on the White Paper on the Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy of the European Union.
Published last February by the European Commission, the White Paper will have a major impact on the future of the paint industry, Dr. Matthias said. The aim of the White Paper is to improve the protection of health and the environment, establish a more transparent and workable regulatory framework for the chemical sector and stimulate innovation in the European industry—all of which CEPE supports. However, CEPE contends there are several weak points.
A fundamental shortcoming, according to CEPE, is that its proposals are geared to large companies in the chemical industry that often produce single chemicals in large quantities. This does not bode well for CEPE’s membership. “Our industry uses almost 10,000 different raw materials, many of them in small quantities, to make millions of different products,”  Dr. Matthias said.
Another area of concern is intended use. The White Paper suggests that chemical manufacturers provide a risk assessment for the intended uses of a substance as part of its registration dossier. “While this concept sounds logical, it is based on the assumption that chemicals manufacturers know all the uses of their products,” Dr. Matthias said. Another reason is protection of intellectual property. Some downstream users that may not want to publicize the use of a certain additives in their formulations.
CEPE is also concerned about economic issues. “A chemicals manufacturer could decide to exclude certain uses from the list of 'intended uses' and thus save the money for the respective tests. In some cases, a raw material supplier may also decide to stop the production of a certain substance rather than going through the costly registration procedure. This is especially likely when the economic value of a substance stands in no relation to the cost of its assessment,” said Dr. Matthias.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Receive free Coatings World emails
Sign up now to receive the weekly newsletter, and more!

Enter your email address:
Company Spotlight
18F, No.85, Sec. 1, Chung-Shiao E. Rd.
Taipei, Taiwan, 100
View Profile
Houchi Chemical Co., Ltd
No.56, Fu Chow Street
Taipei, Taipei, 100
View Profile
BASF Corporation
100 Campus Drive
Florham Park, NJ, 07932
View Profile
Siltech Corporation
225 Wicksteed Avenue
Toronto, ON, M4H 1G5
View Profile
Sunin Machine Co., Ltd.
No.96, Chiao Ho Rd ,Chungho Dist
New Taipei City, Taiwan , 235
Taiwan Roc
View Profile
Micro Powders, Inc.
580 White Plains Rd.
Tarrytown, NY, 10591
View Profile
AZ Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.
No. 458-6, Sinsing Road Hu Kou Township Hsinchu Country 303, Taiwan
Hsinchu Country, Taiwan, 303
View Profile
Follow Coatings World On