• Login
    • Join
  • FOLLOW:
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Research
    • Markets & Technologies
    • Raw Materials
    • Top Companies
    • Directories
    • Jobs
    • Events
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Research
  • Markets & Technologies
  • Raw Materials
  • Top Companies
  • Directories
  • Jobs
  • Events
  • Microsites
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Business Corner
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    World Reports
    eBook
    Top Features
    Powder Coatings Market

    Exterior Architectural Coatings Market

    CHINACOAT 2019 Reaches New Heights

    Automotive Refinish Market

    Asia Pacific Coatings Market
    Breaking News
    Online Exclusives
    Distributor News
    Financial News
    Paint & Coatings Manufacturer News
    People In the News
    Price Increases
    Product News
    Raw Materials & Equipment
    Suppliers News
    Live From Shows
    Top News
    Arkema: Bostik Acquires Danish Company LIP

    Axalta Adds New Epoxy Primer to Tufcote Liquid Industrial Coatings Portfolio

    Chromaflo Technologies Promotes Sergio Duenas to Country Manager of Mexico

    AkzoNobel Acquiring Mauvilac

    Beckers Group Announces Global Price Increase on Coil, Industrial Coatings
    Top Companies report
    Market Research
    White Papers / Tech Papers
    Technical Papers
    Product Spec Sheets
    World Reports
    Adhesives and Sealants
    Aerospace Coatings
    Architectural Coatings
    Automotive Coatings
    Automotive Refinish
    Business Operation
    Color Trends & Forecast
    Construction Chemicals
    Corrosion Control
    Industrial Coatings
    Laboratory Equipment
    Marine Coatings
    Market Trends & Forecast
    Powder Coatings
    Production Equipment
    Radcure Coatings
    Special Purpose Coatings
    Wood Coatings
    "Green" Coatings

    AkzoNobel Acquiring Mauvilac

    Beckers Group Announces Global Price Increase on Coil, Industrial Coatings

    Greenkote PLC Reports Upsurge in Powder Coatings Applications on Brake Calipers

    BASF Doubling Automotive Refinish Coatings Production Capacity at Jiangmen, China Site

    AkzoNobel’s Wanda Vehicle Refinishes Brand Celebrates 85th Anniversary
    Additives
    Binders
    Pigments
    Solvents

    Evonik, Wynca Celebrate Groundbreaking of New Fumed Silica Plant in Zhenjiang

    Archroma Announces CEO Transition Plan

    Pilot Chemical Corp. Acquires Órgano Síntesis

    Sun Chemical Releases 2018 Sustainability Report

    Brenntag Distributes Grupa Azoty ZAK S.A. Plasticizer Portfolio in DACH Region
    Buyers Guide
    Company Capabilities
    Distributor Guide
    Add New Company
    International Buyers Guide Companies
    ROSS Mixers

    Pilot Chemical Company

    Siltech Corporation

    EPS

    Keim Additec Surface USA LLC
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live From Show Event
    Top Events
    Polymers & Coatings Winter 2020 Short Course

    2020 Greenbuild India Conference

    The Waterborne Symposium

    Spray Finishing Training 2020

    Middle East Coatings Show 2020
    Companies
    White Papers/Tech Papers
    Product Spec Sheets
    Equipment
    Literature/Brochures
    Videos
    International Buyers Guide Companies
    Siltech Corporation

    Keim Additec Surface USA LLC

    Pilot Chemical Company

    ROSS Mixers

    EPS
    • Magazine
      • Current / Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Business Corner
      • Digital Edition
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Editorial Guidelines
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • Breaking News
    • Directories
      • Buyers Guide
      • Distributor Guide
      • Corporate Capabilities
      • Trade Associations
      • Add Your Company
    • Markets & Technologies
      • Adhesives and Sealants
      • Aerospace Coatings
      • Architectural Coatings
      • Automotive Coatings
      • Automotive Refinish
      • Business Operation
      • Color Trends & Forecast
      • Construction Chemicals
      • Corrosion Control
      • Industrial Coatings
      • Laboratory Equipment
      • Marine Coatings
      • Market Trends & Forecast
      • Powder Coatings
      • Production Equipment
      • Radcure Coatings
      • Special Purpose Coatings
      • Wood Coatings
      • "Green" Coatings
    • Raw Materials
      • Additives
      • Binders
      • Pigments
      • Solvents
    • World Reports
      • Africa Report
      • China Report
      • India/Asia Pacific Report
      • Europe Report
      • Latin America Report
      • Market Research
      • Russian Report
    • Top Companies
    • Online Exclusives
    • Slideshows
    • Experts Opinions
    • Blog
    • eBook
    • Infographics
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Whitepapers
    • Jobs
    • Microsites
      • Companies
      • White Papers/Tech Papers
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Equipment
      • Literature/Brochures
      • Videos
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Event
      • Webinars
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise With Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    IPaint

    Several Shades of Grey: Who Owns The Trade Secret - The Creator or the Employer?

    Steve McDaniel and Jon Hurt, Technology Litigators04.17.15
    You want the best most innovative people to work for you.  Sure you do.  You hire them for their specialized expertise in your field of technology.  They are the ones that develop your proprietary technology – your trade secrets.  But simultaneously, they are also refining their general expertise in the field. 

    All good things come to an end, and so does their employment.  These valued employees move on to greener pastures, working for, or directly as, a competitor.  But is the work product they now create for a new employer that mirrors, mimics or reflects your products, a misappropriation of your trade secrets or is it merely an application of their expertise in the that field to do their job and make a living? 

    A guiding benchmark is the “employed to invent” doctrine established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 19th century “That which [an employee] has been employed and paid to accomplish becomes, when accomplished, the property of his employer.”  In the absence of written agreement(s) with the employee, often state and federal laws based on this principal will support your claim of ownership of the trade secret created by an employee while employed. 

    However, trade secret misappropriation cases invariably have the local flavor of jurisprudence in the state that they are prosecuted, and different answers to the “who owns it?” question have been generated depending upon the how much light the facts of the case provides. 

    In Wexler v. Greenberg, Buckingham Wax Company’s chemical formulas were often created by the head chemist, Mr. Greenberg, typically through reverse engineering competitors’ formulas and then making improvements.  Mr. Greenberg also had access to all of Buckingham’s formulas made under his supervision, production methods and raw material suppliers.  He later quit and went to work for a different company, Brite Products Co., Inc., that soon began producing Buckingham’s products (i.e., formulas that Mr. Greenberg developed at Buckingham).  Sounds like a clear case of trade secret misappropriation, right?  Not so fast.  The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania found that though the formulas being used by Mr. Greenberg were trade secrets, they were all developed by Mr. Greenberg.  The circumstances were unlike cases where a company provided a trade secret to an employee which would invoke an implied pledge of secrecy given the absence of a written work agreement (hint hint) between Mr. Greenberg with Buckingham that would limit his disclosures.  Thus, the trade secrets created by Mr. Greenberg at Buckingham “forms part of the technical knowledge and skill he has acquired by virtual of his employment with Buckingham and which he has an unqualified privilege to use.” 

    In contrast, though the circumstances were similar, the Supreme Court in Iowa came to a differing conclusion in Basic Chemicals v. Benson by a slight change in the facts.  Mr. Benson was an employee tasked to “establish formulae, lowest costs, highest profits in keeping with competitive markets, sell and create necessary selling force, and otherwise be responsible for all details of” Basic Chemicals, Inc.  After quitting, Mr. Benson became employed by Berman Chemical Company, which began selling products that Mr. Benson asserted to customers would have “physical and performance constants … identical to those purchased from me in the past.”  However, in light of “letters written by Benson to salesmen and customers during his employment by Basic in which he recognized that the various formulas involved were secret and confidential. …Benson praised the ‘know-how’ of Basic.” the court found that the trades secret formula, though developed by Benson were not available for his use in latter employment.  This aspect of the case seems to have hinged on how Benson had characterized the trade secrets, and not by the proactive actions (i.e., employment agreements) of Basic.  But this line of reasoning begs the question, what if Benson had not characterized the formula in a way that could be held as an admission that he knew they were confidential? 

    Though both of these cases occurred prior to the adoption of their version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act by Pennsylvania and Iowa, but they highlight the differing outcomes that can occur based on slight tweaks to the facts of the case in the absence of written contractual agreements.  Trade secret law, a creature born of cases argued before the various state courts, are always fact-intensive.  Basically, they revolve around the old who-done who wrong made-for-TV melodrama format. 

    In certain circumstances, a court may wind up splitting the baby in two regarding ownership of a trade secret created by an employee under the shop rights doctrine.  The shop rights principal finds its home in various state court patent case law where an employee conceives an invention while using an employer’s resources, such as using equipment or materials.  An important difference here though is the factor that the employee was not hired to develop the invention that was conceived.  Under this doctrine, the employee owns the invention (or trade secret), but the employer has the right to use it without paying a royalty.  But, to clearly establish a shop right exists requires a judge deciding so after the hassle of a court case.  And the employee is free to use the trade secret as a competitor.

    However, if you are in California, an employee may have a harder time using this or other types of arguments to gain ownership of work related trade secrets.  The Golden State’s Labor Code Section 2860 explicitly states – “Everything which an employee acquires by virtue of his employment, except the compensation which is due to him from his employer, belongs to the employer, whether acquired lawfully or unlawfully, or during or after the expiration of the term of his employment.”  Well, that seems helpful.  On the flip side, California statues generally ban non-competition agreements that we have previously discussed as a way to limit potential misuse of trade secret information by former employees.  And California statutes, as well as those of some other states, explicitly prohibit an employment agreement from becoming overly ambitious by requiring assignment of an invention made using the employee’s own time and resources, which arguably carries over to trade secrets.

    To make things even murkier, what happens if in the above examples, if it was not an employee, but an independent contractor involved?

    The Massachusetts Superior Court recently ruled in C.R.T.R., Inc. v. Lao, et al. that an independent contractor who had taken customer names, prices, accounting records and business relationship information about another company could not be sued for trade secret misappropriation.  Some of the facts that seem to weigh most against the plaintiff was the lack of confidentiality agreement with the independent contractor, and the depositions of employees that one “know the customer lists were confidential, though no one had ever told her so” and another employee stating that “on one occasion, she was told not to bring work out of the office” as being inadequate evidence that “any measures were taken to protect its purported trade secrets.” 

    However, for creation of a trade secret by an independent contractor working for a client, the U.S. District Court in Colorado in Computer Assoc. Int’l, Inc. v. American Fundware, Inc., applied extension of trade secret common law employer ownership to an employee created trade secret to an independent contractor stating that “status as an employee or an independent contractor … is irrelevant to the ownership of a trade secret.”  This case is often cited in other federal district court cases. 

    Sorry to tell you this, but this area of laws protecting your trade secrets is literally “50 shades of Grey” as that’s the number of stars in old glory.  The take home message is you should check with your local counsel familiar with the state laws that may come into play in protecting your trade secrets.  Though almost all states have now adopted versions of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, there may be differences between the versions from one state you do business in with another’s.  And each state may have very specific statues and past case law history that may influence the outcome of litigation.  With that in mind, your legal team should without fail draft legal agreements that most advantageous for you to match the likely jurisdictions where lawsuits may be filed, and minimalize the shadows cast by state law effects’ on your claim to ownership of the trade secrets created in the conduct of your business. 
    Related Searches
    • Business Operation
    Related Knowledge Center
    • Business Operation

    Related IPaint

    • Business Operation

      Going to Court: Hard Spots and Rocks!

      Civil court is a double-edged sword that can cut you pretty badly when trying to keep your trade secrets actually Secret.  You can go to court specifically to stop use or disclosure of your proprietary information, or even for some reason not re…
      by Steve McDaniel and Jon Hurt , Technology Litigators 02.23.15

    • Business Operation

      What the FOIA! Freedom of Information Act vs. Secrecy of Your Trade Secrets

      Ahh, the glory of a transparent government.  Everyone can find out what is being done in an open manner when the taxpayers’ dollars are being spent.  That’s a good thing, unless it involves your trade secrets. One way this can…
      Steve McDaniel and Jon Hurt, Contributing Writers 12.15.14

    • Business Operation
      Patent Pendency: A Great Reason to Cherish Your Trade Secrets

      Patent Pendency: A Great Reason to Cherish Your Trade Secrets

      So, rather than protecting your product and your market share using trade secrets, you opt to patent your new and exciting additive, coating formulation, paint container, paint sprayer, etc., in the United States. Let’s say the U.S. is a huge m…
      Steve McDaniel, JD, PhD; and Jon Hurt, PhD, Technology Litigators 04.19.12


    • Business Operation | Market Trends & Forecast
      Trade Secrets and Employees: Are you covering your Ass(ets)?

      Trade Secrets and Employees: Are you covering your Ass(ets)?

      Secret formulas, manufacturing pro­cesses, financial information, future product plans, customer lists…what are your trade secrets and what are you doing to protect them from inadvertent or intentional misuse or misappropriation by your ow…
      Beth McDaniel, JD & Steve McDaniel, PhD, JD, Contributing Writers 03.19.12

    • Business Operation | Market Trends & Forecast
      Would You Even Know A Trade Secret If It Jumped Up and Bit You Somewhere?

      Would You Even Know A Trade Secret If It Jumped Up and Bit You Somewhere?

      OK. We all know what trade secrets are, right? The formula for Coca Cola is supposedly in a heavily guarded vault in Atlanta (yeah, right). We can all probably agree that if someone swipes the Coke formula, they are guilty of trade secret theft (amon…
      Steve McDaniel, PhD, JD, Contributing Editor 02.15.12

    • Additives | Business Operation | Market Trends & Forecast
      If We Told You That, We’d Have To... You Know...

      If We Told You That, We’d Have To... You Know...

      Protecting novel compositions and processes.
      Steve McDaniel, PhD, JD, Technology Litigators, Contributing Editor 01.24.12


    Breaking News
    • Arkema: Bostik Acquires Danish Company LIP
    • Axalta Adds New Epoxy Primer to Tufcote Liquid Industrial Coatings Portfolio
    • Chromaflo Technologies Promotes Sergio Duenas to Country Manager of Mexico
    • AkzoNobel Acquiring Mauvilac
    • Beckers Group Announces Global Price Increase on Coil, Industrial Coatings
    View Breaking News >
    CURRENT ISSUE

    December 2019

    • Powder Coatings Market
    • View More >
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms And Conditions
    • Contact Us

    follow us

    Subscribe
    Nutraceuticals World

    Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

    Deerland Obtains Certification from Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration
    OptiMSM Shown to Improve Hair & Nail Appearance and Condition
    DCC Acquires Contract Manufacturer Ion Laboratories
    Coatings World

    Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

    Arkema: Bostik Acquires Danish Company LIP
    Axalta Adds New Epoxy Primer to Tufcote Liquid Industrial Coatings Portfolio
    Chromaflo Technologies Promotes Sergio Duenas to Country Manager of Mexico
    Medical Product Outsourcing

    Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

    FDA OKs World's First Single-Use Duodenoscope
    Dr. Stephen Hahn Confirmed as New FDA Leader
    FDA OKs First Test to Help Screen for Newborn Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
    Contract Pharma

    Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

    Sanofi Awarded $226M by US Gov't for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
    Amgen Selects Location For R&D Facility
    Arctoris Opens Oxford R&D Facility
    Beauty Packaging

    Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

    Time Features 5 Best Beauty Inventions
    CES 2020 Preview - Innovation Award Honorees in Health & Wellness
    Prada & L’Oréal Sign Long-Term Licensing Deal
    Happi

    Latest Breaking News From Happi

    Cosmetic Assessments Revealed at CIR Panel
    T-Boz Launches CBD Line
    DRF and Flowerkist Develop CBD Range
    Ink World

    Latest Breaking News From Ink World

    Ripon Printers Adds Ricoh Pro C9210
    LogoJet Opens Bogota, Colombia Office
    Canon Solutions America Powers University of Notre Dame Athletics' Printing Capabilities
    Label & Narrow Web

    Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

    GSE products provide quality assurance for Pharmalabel
    Luminer promotes Heather Bookman to prepress manager
    Materials Exchange launches to solve excess inventory issue
    Nonwovens Industry

    Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

    Bouckaert to Launch New Equipment
    DuPont to Acquire Osmosis Specialist
    Nice-Pak to Expand in Indiana
    Orthopedic Design & Technology

    Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

    FDA OKs First Test to Help Screen for Newborn Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
    Europe, North America Comprise More Than 80 Percent of Global Bone Marrow Transplantation Demand
    TriMed Closes Out FDA Warning Letter
    Printed Electronics Now

    Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

    3D Printing Materials Market to Grow at 23.9% CAGR Through 2025: GVR
    Kyocera, TactoTek Collaborate on Injection Molded Structural Electronics Solutions
    Toray Opens R&D Innovation Center for the Future

    Copyright © 2019 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.